Strategize to Win: How Prioritizing Compliance Can Aid in Winning Government Contracts

For companies seeking to win lucrative DoD contracts, having a strategic focus on compliance is no longer just an option but an imperative one. Compliance can make or break a company's prospects of getting a defense contract in the complex world of government procurement, where rules and regulations are complex and always shifting. By proactively making regulatory adherence central to strategy, companies can differentiate themselves, reduce risks, and open pathways to winning more government business.

This article will illustrate how compliance, when elevated as a core competitive advantage, can become a vital strategic asset in successfully bidding on and winning government contracts.

Compliance as a Strategic Priority

The process of contracting with the government, like the Department of Defense, is multifaceted. Beyond technical capabilities and resources, positioning a company competitively requires a nuanced understanding of the intricacies and frequent changes within contracting regulations. With various laws like the Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific rules shaping procurement requirements, compliance is crucial.

Non-compliance can lead to disqualification, penalties, and lost opportunities. Conversely, companies that consistently comply build credibility and trust with buyers. By prioritizing regulatory adherence in their strategy, companies can gain a competitive edge in bidding situations. When compliance becomes ingrained in operations, it paves the way for securing more government contract awards.

Understanding Federal Government Contracting Regulations

In order to gain advantages through compliance, companies must first comprehend the complex regulatory frameworks that define contracting requirements. Key regulations include:

  • Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR): The FAR outlines uniform policies for the acquisition of supplies and services by government agencies. It covers contract formation, pricing, contract types, and more. FAR compliance is mandatory.
  • Agency FAR Supplements: Specific agencies like the Department of Defense also issue their own supplements, such as the DFARS, that augment the FAR with additional rules.
  • Small Business Regulations: Regulations like FAR Part 19 detail requirements around fair opportunities for DoD contracts for small business.
  • Socioeconomic Regulations: Additional rules exist around contracting with specific types of disadvantaged or underrepresented businesses.
  • Regulations pertaining to cybersecurity: FedRAMP and NIST SP 800-171 set forth the security and risk management standards that contractors must adhere to.

Companies must constantly evaluate compliance requirements pertaining to their contracting activities due to frequent legislative changes and upgrades.

Making Compliance a Core Competitive Advantage

In government procurement, where buyers are obligated to ensure the responsible use of taxpayer funds, they look for contractors who meet compliance standards. Some key advantages include:

  • Reduced Risks: Companies can avoid penalties, lawsuits, and even suspension or debarment from government contracts by complying with all regulatory standards. This safeguards their reputation.
  • Supports Eligibility: Documentation of compliance with regulations provides proof to contracting officers that the company meets thresholds to bid for contracts.
  • Competitive Differentiator: Government buyers often default to the choice with the strongest compliance record, as it demonstrates reliability and commitment to ethics.
  • Trust and Credibility: Over time, consistent compliance results in companies becoming “preferred vendors”, positioning them for more contract opportunities.
  • Promotes Accountability: Regulations require thorough monitoring and documentation, encouraging accountability within the company around contract execution.

Steps to Integrate Compliance into Strategy

Build a Foundation of Regulatory Knowledge

Understanding the complexities of federal contracts and requirements is a critical first step for businesses trying to strategically use compliance.  Companies should invest time upfront to thoroughly review critical regulations like the FAR, DFARS, agency-specific rules, cybersecurity protocols, and other pertinent guidelines. Having a broad understanding enables businesses to manage intricacies and achieve perfect compliance with requirements. Maintaining ongoing awareness through regular review also helps spot changes and updates early. With a strong knowledge foundation, companies can avoid the risks of uninformed non-compliance and ensure their activities align strategically with evolving regulations.

Develop Robust Compliance Programs

Armed with a deep understanding of regulatory requirements, companies must translate knowledge into action through customized compliance programs. Companies should develop formal policies, procedures, training systems, controls, and documentation protocols tailored to their specific contracting activities and risks. For instance, companies handling sensitive government data may need more stringent cybersecurity controls than general administrative contractors. Robust programs demonstrate a sincere commitment to fulfilling regulations, a key factor government buyers value. They also provide a framework for consistent regulatory adherence across the company.

Monitor for Risks Through Assessments

While building compliant programs is crucial, companies must also be proactive in identifying potential gaps and risks. Conducting periodic audits and control assessments focused on government contracting activities enables companies to verify that compliance protocols are working as intended. Internal or third-party assessors can catch issues like policy lapses, training needs, documentation gaps, or new regulations missing from programs. Identifying and mitigating risks early is far more strategic than dealing with non-compliance consequences later. These monitoring activities serve to emphasize that compliance is a continuous focus.

Maintain Meticulous Compliance Records

Backing up compliance claims with evidence is vital when bidding on contracts, as government evaluators want documented proof. Companies should implement centralized systems to maintain up-to-date records and reports related to regulatory requirements, for example, training logs, system access reports, control assessments, corrective actions, and improvement plans. Organized documentation shows accountability and transparency if any process gaps are identified. Demonstrating meticulous attention to record-keeping builds confidence in the company’s reliability.

Educate Employees Through Training

Employee education is the key to compliance success. Businesses should develop frequent training programs to educate all employees on federal contracting legislation, processes, duties, and high-risk areas, from individual contributors to leadership. Training empowers employees to uphold standards by increasing their expertise. It also reduces compliance blind spots that can turn into bid-ending risks. Tracking training completion provides evidence of workforce commitment during bidding. Investing in compliance training indicates that priorities permeate beyond the surface.

Continuously Update for Regulatory Changes

With government regulations frequently evolving, maintaining awareness and making timely modifications is imperative. Companies should designate personnel to actively monitor websites, alerts, and media for new regulatory changes. As updates are detected, businesses must evaluate their implications quickly but methodically, revise policies and processes to adapt, train affected groups on changes, and update compliance documents. The seamless integration of changes indicates the strategic agility that government buyers seek. Keeping up with changes keeps compliance positioning fresh.

Compliance as a Pathway to Winning Contracts

When companies make compliance an integral part of their culture and operations, it can strengthen their competitiveness and open doors to winning more government contracts.

By diligently meeting all regulatory requirements, companies showcase their commitment to ethical business practices and secure eligibility to respond to a broader range of contracting opportunities. Thorough compliance indicates readiness to take on the responsibilities of taxpayer-funded government work. It provides access to Requests for Proposals that companies with compliance gaps or negligence may be excluded from.

During the proposal evaluation process, a standout record of compliance can be persuasive in convincing contracting officers of a bidder’s responsibility. Companies can devote sections of their proposals to demonstrating well-developed compliance programs, controls, training procedures, and past performance histories. Documented proof of robust systems for regulatory adherence and risk management distinguishes compliant bidders from others.

For contracting officers vetting competitive proposals, lapses in compliance are often grounds for disqualification.

Negligent bidders may be perceived as higher-risk and irresponsible choices for contract awards due to their gaps. However, companies boasting strong compliance are likely to progress favorably through technical and cost evaluations. Their thorough adherence to regulations conveys reliability.

Furthermore, many contract awards have been granted to companies primarily based on their reputation for compliant business practices and ethical conduct. When regulatory adherence is ingrained internally, trust in a company’s ability to successfully fulfill contracts is higher.

Compliance integrity can even supersede factors like cost.

Beyond the bidding phase, compliance remains essential during contract delivery to prevent performance issues. By proactively managing risks and monitoring for changing regulations, compliant contractors reduce delays, cost overruns, and other disruptions. This enables them to maintain the viability of awards over the long-term.

Ultimately, an unwavering commitment to compliance excellence pays dividends in terms of competitiveness and advantage when striving to win government contracts. It paves a strategic pathway to success.

Make Compliance Central to Contracting Strategy

In summary, government contracting should not be approached as merely an operational concern. Rather, companies must embrace compliance as a strategic priority that can amplify their chances of winning lucrative contracts.

When regulatory adherence is emphasized in the same light as capabilities, performance, and cost, it becomes a competitive differentiator. By investing to integrate compliance into culture, processes, and documentation, companies pave the way for current and future government contract success.

In the world of government procurement, where rules and requirements perpetually evolve, the compliant WILL thrive.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are some examples of regulations all government contractors need to comply with?

Some key regulations all government contractors must comply with include the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), agency-specific FAR supplements like DFARS, regulations related to small business and socioeconomic contracting requirements, cybersecurity rules like FedRAMP and NIST 800-171, and any state/local laws pertinent to the contract.

How often do government contracting regulations change?

Government contracting regulations change frequently, sometimes multiple times within a single year. Changes occur due to new legislation, security threats, procurement policy overhauls, and more. It is critical for contractors to constantly monitor for regulatory updates.

What are some consequences of non-compliance with contracting regulations?

Consequences for non-compliance can include rejection of proposals, loss of contracts, financial penalties, suspension and debarment from government work, lawsuits, and significant reputational damages. In some cases, criminal charges may also be pursued.

What resources can companies leverage to stay on top of regulatory changes?

Useful resources include signing up for alerts from watchdog agencies, joining industry working groups, consulting attorneys/advisors specializing in government contracting, reading contracting focused publications regularly, and designating internal team members to track updates.

How can companies demonstrate their commitment to compliance when bidding for contracts?

In bids, companies can include sections that highlight their compliance programs, training procedures, monitoring controls, past performance history, related certifications, and specialized personnel. Providing documented evidence of robust compliance helps convince evaluators.

Backed by an award-winning cyber security and IT management team, On Call Compliance Solutions is the #1 source for CMMC, NIST SP 800-171 Compliance, DFARS and ITAR consulting. Give us a call now to schedule a free phone call with one of our compliance experts to see how we can help.

NIST SP 800-171 Compliance Experts


Fill out the form below to get a FREE consultation with one of our CMMC, NIST SP 800-171, DFARS and ITAR experts who can help you achieve your goals. There is never a fee or obligation to find out how we can help.

Contact Us